Link building
I carry out outreach to website owners: enquiries, follow-up, and agreeing the terms and form of the mention with a complete set of data. After publication I check the link (URL, anchor, indexability, attributes, local data) and update the log with statuses. I close the monitoring with a report, recommendations, a list of NAP/target page problems and a plan for further work.
I start by putting the target pages and materials in order, so that the links lead to the right places and are locally consistent. I then plan the linking priorities and build and assess the list of publication sites, setting the acceptance rules for the next steps.
If the right local pages are missing or the NAP data is inconsistent, I put part of the link building work on hold until the foundations are fixed.
I create a map of the target pages to be strengthened and assign to them the types of planned link sources and the supporting assets that can be linked to.
I collect prospects and assign them to a location and link type, assess relevance, credibility and risks (spam, PBN, mass directories), and we agree the acceptance rules before contact or publication.
Defining the local scope of link building means jointly determining which cities/districts, services and target pages are to be strengthened with links. At this stage I set the priorities: which locations matter most, which services take precedence and which specific pages the traffic from publications and citations should lead to. As a result, the further work is not “general” but matched to the real service area and the structure of the site. The arrangements from this step are the reference point for the audit and the later choice of link sources.
To get started, input data and access are needed, including the list of locations/service areas and the NAP data (name, address, phone).
In parallel we agree the mode of cooperation: whether the client provides relationships/partners and materials (e.g. a company description, photos), who approves the content or listings, and how quickly corrections are made on the website. These decisions affect the preparation of the pages and materials for link building and the efficiency of later publications.
An audit of the link profile and local signals is a check of what the company’s link environment currently looks like and whether the local foundations are consistent and ready to be strengthened. I verify the current links in terms of how local they are and their quality, and also whether consistent NAP data appears across the web and whether suitable local pages exist to link to. This stage makes it possible to identify the elements that need to be fixed before more intensive outreach begins. The results of the audit are also the starting point for a comparison with the local competition.
As part of the audit I carry out three complementary analyses that set out the risks and the priorities of the work. The backlink analysis covers distinguishing local from general links and assessing the anchors, target pages, the topics of the domains and potential risks (e.g. low-quality sources or unnatural anchors). The analysis of citations and NAP consistency consists of verifying the presence in directories and local sites and pointing out the discrepancies to be corrected. The local competitor analysis compares the types of link and citation sources used by competitors and the gaps to be filled, which then informs the choice of link source types depending on the industry and location.
Preparing pages and materials for link building means matching the target pages and assets so that the links acquired lead to the right places and make sense to a local audience. At this stage I create a map of the target pages to be strengthened, covering, among other things, the contact page, the landing page for a city/service and the key categories. In parallel I assign the types of planned link sources to these pages, so that the later outreach and publications are consistent with the local priorities. The result is an organised set of pages and linking directions, ready for further work.
As part of the preparation I also refine the supporting assets that can be linked to, such as descriptions of local services, information about the company, informational materials and a section on cooperation/partnership. Which materials are available and how they are approved depends on the agreed mode of cooperation (e.g. whether the client provides relationships/partners and materials, and who approves the content).
As a result, publications do not strengthen random URLs or entrench inconsistent data across the web.
Prospecting and qualifying publication sites means building a list of potential websites from which to obtain a link and assessing their local usefulness and quality. I begin by collecting contacts for local and industry sites, organisations, partners, directories and event pages, and then assign them to a location and the type of planned link. Such a list of prospects organises the work and makes it possible to control where and in what form a mention may appear. This is the stage that directly prepares the outreach and the publication arrangements.
Qualifying prospects means assessing local relevance, topic, credibility and the real possibility of obtaining a link, taking editorial requirements into account. In parallel I identify the risks, including potential spam, PBN and mass directories, in order to limit sources that could lower the quality of the profile. On the basis of this assessment we set the rules for accepting sources: whether the client approves the list of sites before contact or publication and which types of sites are excluded. These rules affect the pace of further work, because contact and publications take place in line with the agreed conditions.
Outreach and publications cover contact with website owners, agreeing the terms of publication and getting the link placed in line with the previously adopted rules for accepting sources. In practice I send the enquiries and follow up, and then agree the form of the mention (e.g. a listing, profile, article, partnership) and the full set of required data and materials. This stage depends on the decisions about cooperation: who approves the content or listings and how quickly corrections are made on the website. What is agreed in the conversations and the editorial requirements affect when the publication can appear and in what form.
After publication I check the link to confirm that it matches what was agreed and that the implementation is technically correct. I check, among other things, the correctness of the URL, the anchor, indexability, the link attributes and whether the publication contains the right local data. The outcome of the work is a log of publications and links, completed with statuses and notes on compliance. The limits of influence and timing have to be taken into account: there is no full control over publishers’ decisions, the time of publication or whether links are kept, and the pace also depends on responses, editorial requirements and the client’s approval.
Monitoring and reporting the effectiveness of local link building means tracking on an ongoing basis the links and citations acquired, the publication statuses, and changes in local visibility and traffic on the target pages. As part of the monitoring I update the log of publications and links so that it reflects the state of the work and compliance with what was agreed. As a result, it is clear which publications are live, which need clarification or correction, and which target pages are actually being strengthened. Such monitoring informs further decisions about which source types to continue with and where to add more work.
In the activity report and recommendations I present a summary of the steps taken and an assessment of the effectiveness of the source types used. The report also contains a list of problems to be fixed (NAP/target pages), if they affect the consistency of local signals and the possibility of further publications. On this basis I prepare a plan for the next steps, based on the current statuses and the observations from the monitoring. The scope and pace of updates depend on how the publications are going and whether the required approvals and corrections on the client’s side are being carried out on an ongoing basis.
Feedback from clients and industry people I have worked with on SEO projects.

I had the chance to work with Kuba at Kulturalnie o SEO, an event I organise. Kuba did a great job as a speaker and received high marks from the audience. He showed professionalism and broad knowledge. In other projects at Vestigio, Kuba shows enormous commitment, a willingness to explore and implement new ideas, and excellent organisation of his work.

You talk to me, not a salesperson
I work as a freelancer: the same person reads your message, prepares the quote and then runs the project. No sales team in between.