Content SEO
I put together an outline with headings, the order of sections and places for CTAs and links. Based on the brief I prepare an AI-assisted draft, followed by substantive editing and language proofreading, with the formatting tidied up. On the SEO side I adapt the content (meta, linking), carry out quality control, flag passages that need confirmation and implement corrections for approval.
I start by establishing whether we are working on existing material or creating content from scratch. I then assess how well it matches the topic and the search intent. On that basis I plan the structure and order of sections and refine successive versions.
I establish whether the content should be created from scratch or rebuilt, and how extensive the rewriting and verification will be.
I check the completeness and consistency of the material against the search intent, and point out ambiguous passages and areas that need more careful handling.
I organise the outline, plan the structure and order of sections, prepare a working version or paraphrases and additions, and then refine the text in successive steps
The initial requirements and the brief serve to establish precisely the goal of the text and the rules for preparing and verifying it. At this stage I collect information about the type of publication, the target audience, the tone and language, as well as the formal requirements and restrictions (e.g. communication bans, compliance). We also agree on the delivery format and the way of working — whether we operate on a file or edit the content in a chosen system. These decisions are the point of reference for the later analysis, editing and quality control.
The brief also leads to the key decisions that affect the scope and the way the work is carried out. We establish whether the work involves creating content from scratch or rebuilding existing material, which determines the level of rewriting and the number of elements to verify. We also define the level of editorial intervention: from cosmetic corrections (language/style) to deep changes (structure, argumentation, sections and their order).
The input materials are the basis for analysing the content and intent and for preparing the AI-assisted draft. They may include texts to improve (if any exist), brand guidelines, a list of topics or keywords, subject-matter sources and reference links. The materials also indicate the mandatory elements, such as CTAs, a description of the offer or contact details, which need to be included in the structure. The less ambiguous the input, the more efficiently the completeness of the information and the consistency of the message can be assessed.
The role of the materials is also critical for verifying the content and limiting risks at the quality control stage. On their basis I identify potentially ambiguous passages, inconsistent data and passages that need to be confirmed by the client, including possible unsubstantiated statements. Access to information and sources for verification determines the scope of the fact-check, and gaps in the sources may limit the ability to confirm claims. This is especially important when the brief contains formal requirements or sensitive areas.
The “new text vs. rework” decision means establishing whether the content should be created from scratch or rebuilt on the basis of existing material. In practice, this means matching the way of working to how many elements can be kept and how many need to be rewritten or reorganised. This choice affects the scope of the analysis, the level of rewriting and the number of passages that need verification and clarification. Establishing the mode of work is also the starting point for further planning of the structure and the order of sections.
As part of this decision we also clarify how many changes the text is to undergo in the next steps. If the goal is a rework, I assess which passages need paraphrasing and additions and which can simply be tidied up before editing. If the text is to be created from scratch, the scope covers preparing a working version based on what has been agreed, and then refining it. Whichever option is chosen, the decision gives order to the further work on the outline and the section plan.
Content analysis and user intent analysis means assessing whether the material is on topic and answers the search intent. I check the completeness of the information and whether the structure is coherent and leads the reader along a logical line. I also verify whether the text contains risks, such as unsubstantiated claims or sensitive areas that need more careful handling. The results of the analysis are the basis for establishing how the editing should proceed.
In this part of the work I also identify the places where the content is ambiguous or where terms and arguments need clarifying. The assessment covers the consistency of the message across the whole material, so that successive sections follow from one another and are in line with the goal of the publication. If additional information or sources are needed for verification, the scope of the checks depends on access to them. Based on the analysis, it is possible to decide precisely whether the changes should be cosmetic or whether a deeper rebuild is required.
Creating the outline and content structure means arranging the headings and the order of sections so that the material is complete and ready for further editing. At this stage I lay out the skeleton of the publication and point out the elements that are missing from the material or that are worth adding to round off the topic in line with the goal of the text. As part of the plan I also mark the places for CTAs and for the links that are to appear in the text. The outline is prepared on the basis of the brief and the decisions on the mode of work and the level of editorial intervention.
In the outline I also organise the logic of the transitions between sections, so that later refinement of the content does not require chaotic reshuffling of passages. If the structure needs additional modules (e.g. definitions, examples or an FAQ), they are clearly planned and described as elements to be filled in. As a result, the next stage of work can focus on preparing the draft and editing, rather than on working out the layout from scratch. The format in which the outline is handed over matches the way of working agreed earlier (a file or editing in a system).
Editing and proofreading cover preparing a working version of the content, refining its substance and correcting the language to arrive at a version ready for publication. The work starts with an AI-assisted draft based on the brief and the input materials, which is then organised and developed to the editing stage. Next comes substantive editing, followed by language proofreading and tidying up the formatting for publication. After that, the content can be optimised for SEO, and it then goes through quality control and rounds of corrections until the final version is approved.
Throughout these stages I check for consistency, ambiguities and the risks associated with unsubstantiated statements, including potential “hallucinations” in AI-assisted content. Passages that cannot be confirmed without access to sources are flagged as requiring confirmation on the client’s side, and gaps in the sources may limit fact verification.
At the corrections stage we also establish which comments change the scope of work (e.g. a new section, new sources or a change of topic).
The AI-assisted content draft is a working version of the text prepared on the basis of the brief and the input materials. At this stage I fill in the missing sections, organise the information and paraphrase where this is needed for further editing. The draft is meant to be material for refinement, not a final version, so its role is to bring the content together into a coherent whole. The text then moves on to substantive editing.
Substantive editing means refining the meaning and completeness of the content in line with the goal of the text and the guidelines. In practice, this covers organising the argumentation, removing repetition, clarifying terms and matching the content to the audience. Language proofreading covers correcting spelling, punctuation, grammar, inflection and typos, and making the style and terminology consistent. As part of the proofreading I also tidy up the formatting so that the text is suitable for pasting in or publishing directly.
SEO optimisation of the content covers matching the headings, introduction and sections to user queries and tidying up the semantics, readability and scannability. As part of this stage I prepare proposals for the meta elements and point out places for internal linking, in line with the agreed scope. Quality control covers checking consistency and compliance with the brief, and flagging the passages that need to be confirmed by the client. Once the comments have been collected, rounds of corrections are carried out and the version for publication is given final approval.
Feedback from clients and industry people I have worked with on SEO projects.

I had the chance to work with Kuba at Kulturalnie o SEO, an event I organise. Kuba did a great job as a speaker and received high marks from the audience. He showed professionalism and broad knowledge. In other projects at Vestigio, Kuba shows enormous commitment, a willingness to explore and implement new ideas, and excellent organisation of his work.

You talk to me, not a salesperson
I work as a freelancer: the same person reads your message, prepares the quote and then runs the project. No sales team in between.