Content SEO
At the kick-off I clarify the goal of the page or text, define the audience and the offer the content has to fit, and point out legal and industry constraints. We agree the contact channel, deadlines, file format, type of brief and scope of the package. I build the briefs from the client’s materials: the offer, advantages, FAQ, product materials, existing content and the price list, if applicable.
I start by clarifying the goal and context of the content and agreeing the rules of cooperation. I then collect materials from the company and verify the industry and communication constraints. On that basis I refine the brief and we go through the review iterations.
I clarify the goal of the page or text, define the audience, specify the offer, and agree the contact channel, deadlines and file format.
I collect information about the offer and advantages, the price list (if applicable), FAQ, product materials and existing content to be reused or updated.
Based on the materials I refine the requirements, assess how consistent the content is with the offer when updating a URL, and we agree who is responsible for the subject matter during the review.
The kick-off and arrangements are the stage at which I clarify the goal of the page or text, define the audience and specify the offer the content has to fit. At the start I also identify legal and industry constraints, so that the brief does not lead to recommendations that are out of line with the realities of the company’s communication. In parallel we agree how we will work together: the contact channel, deadlines and the file format we work in. As a result, the brief is produced within agreed conditions and can be used efficiently by the company’s team or a contractor.
During the kick-off, decisions are made that determine the further elements of the brief, including the type of brief and its purpose. We agree whether the brief is for an article, a landing page, a category/product description, a local page or an update of an existing URL, because this affects the structure and the range of required elements. I also establish the scope of the brief package: the number of documents, languages/markets and the priorities of topics or URLs.
Input materials are the set of information from the company without which it is not possible to prepare reliable SEO briefs tied to the real offer. It is up to the client to provide data about the offer, the advantages and — if applicable — the price list, as well as FAQ and product materials. Existing content that can be reused or updated as part of the planned work is also important. This information is the basis for refining the subject matter and avoiding a mismatch between the content and what the company actually offers.
The completeness and quality of the input materials affect how precisely the requirements can be described in the brief and how smoothly the iterations at the review stage go. On their basis we also specify the communication constraints that must be reflected in the content. If the brief is for an update of an existing URL, the materials support the assessment of how consistent the current content is with the offer and the identification of gaps.
The brief type options cover a brief for an article, a landing page, a category/product description, a local page or an update of an existing URL. We settle this choice before the analysis proper, because it determines the structure of the document and which elements it must contain. Depending on its purpose, the brief will put the emphasis on a different arrangement of sections, different required information and a different way of leading the user to the answer or the offer. As a result, the brief is matched to a specific task rather than being a universal instruction “for everything”.
If the brief is for an update of an existing URL, the process includes an analysis of the current content in terms of topics, intent and gaps. I also check for potential duplication or keyword cannibalisation, the heading structure, the metadata and the consistency of the content with the offer. For new content, the centre of gravity shifts to designing the outline and the guidelines that will make it possible to prepare a complete piece from scratch. In both scenarios, the decision on the type of brief affects the scope of the on-page and semantic guidelines and the internal linking plan.
As part of matching the brief to its purpose, I also analyse the search results and intent, to establish which content types dominate for the queries and what answer the user expects. I then carry out topic and keyword research, choosing the main topic and a set of supporting queries divided by intent and content section. The next step is an analysis of the competing content in the results, in order to compare structures, threads and the standard of information. I translate these conclusions into a content structure design in the form of H1/H2/H3, together with a list of required elements that must appear in the piece.
The scope of the brief package covers establishing the number of briefs, the languages/markets, the priorities of topics or URLs, and whether the work concerns updates of existing content or only new content. These parameters define what we work on first and how widely we spread the analysis across different markets or language versions. The scope also affects how thoroughly I plan topic coverage and how I arrange the queue of documents to be prepared. As a result, the briefs are produced in a logical order and are tied to the real priorities on the business and content side.
The arrangements on markets and languages carry over into the analysis of search results and intent, because different content formats and user expectations may dominate in different markets. In practice this means that for each agreed priority I carry out tailored topic and keyword research and compare the standard of the content competing in the results. On that basis I create the content structure design and the full set of guidelines needed to produce the piece. Each brief brings these elements together in a single working document: the goal and intent, the main topic, the set of queries, the outline, on-page guidelines, linking and checklists.
If the scope includes updates, the package contains briefs based on an assessment of existing URLs, including the identification of gaps, structure and metadata problems, and the risk of keyword cannibalisation. Regardless of whether a brief is for new content or an update, the scope of the package is not the same as a guarantee of results in the search results. A brief remains a set of guidelines, and the outcome depends, among other things, on the quality of the text written, the implementation, the competition and changes in the results. These conditions are worth taking into account when deciding which topics and URLs are priorities in the package.
Analysing the search results and user intent means checking which content types dominate for the queries related to the topic and what answer the user expects. I verify whether the results are dominated by a guide format, a list, a definition or a sales page, because this affects the choice of information and the way it is presented. In doing so I take into account the agreed language and market, since these parameters can change the picture of the search results. The conclusions from this step are the basis for the further selection of topics and supporting queries.
Based on the identified intent, I specify which content elements are essential to meet the user’s expectations within the agreed page type. This stage also helps to reduce the risk of the content missing the goal of the page and what the user is looking for in a given context. The intent analysis is carried out in a way that matches the purpose of the brief, which carries over into the later structure and required sections. As a result, the subsequent steps of the brief are based on observations from the search results rather than on assumptions.
Designing the content structure means putting together an outline that specifies the H1/H2/H3 layout, the order of sections and the required information. In the structure I indicate the elements that must be included, such as definitions, examples, checklists and other components needed to cover the topic fully. The outline follows from the earlier arrangements on the purpose of the brief and from the analysis of search results and intent. If the brief is for an update of an existing URL, the structure also reflects the conclusions from the assessment of the current content in terms of gaps, consistency and the risks of duplication or keyword cannibalisation.
To the designed structure I add on-page, semantic and credibility guidelines and an internal linking plan, so that the brief is a complete instruction for preparing the content. For on-page, I provide proposals for the title, meta description and URL, rules for using headings, pointers on featured snippets and images with alt descriptions, and possible structured data, if it suits the page type. I also establish the industry terminology, tone and consistency of naming, and additionally mark the topics to avoid and the way of explaining concepts for the given audience. Separately, I specify where sources, data, quotes, practical experience or author/expert elements are needed and how to document claims, and I describe internal linking as a list of target pages with proposed placements and anchors and an indication of supporting pages.
Feedback from clients and industry people I have worked with on SEO projects.

I had the chance to work with Kuba at Kulturalnie o SEO, an event I organise. Kuba did a great job as a speaker and received high marks from the audience. He showed professionalism and broad knowledge. In other projects at Vestigio, Kuba shows enormous commitment, a willingness to explore and implement new ideas, and excellent organisation of his work.

You talk to me, not a salesperson
I work as a freelancer: the same person reads your message, prepares the quote and then runs the project. No sales team in between.