Content SEO
I put together a backlog and content calendar with priorities, the page goal, intent and format, and the criteria for readiness to publish. I prepare production guidelines: structure, headings, mandatory elements, citing sources, style, linking and on-page standards. I support publication with consultations and SEO editing, and deliver a model for reporting and update rules.
I start with a kick-off workshop, at which I collect data and set the framework for the collaboration. I then review the existing content and organise it according to its role in the user journey. I carry out the work in agreed iterations with a clear approval procedure.
At the kick-off workshop I collect input materials and access (traffic, conversions, offer, audience, content, brand guidelines) so that priorities are based on data.
I establish the areas of the site, content types, languages/markets and approval rules, and clarify the level of editing and the number of iterations.
I inventory the URLs and assess the content for quality, intent, duplication and consistency, and then decide which pages to update, merge, remove or create.
The kick-off and agreeing the scope of the content strategy consists of a start-up workshop during which we specify exactly what the work will cover and how it will be run. At this stage I establish the areas of the site, the content types and the topic priorities, and identify the constraints relating to the brand, the law and available resources. In parallel, we agree how materials will be approved, so that the later stages (audit, research and publication planning) have clearly defined rules of collaboration. The scope of work may also include decisions about markets/languages and about how far we go into individual content formats.
For a smooth start, access and input materials are needed, because without them it is not possible to set priorities reliably and base decisions on data. In practice this covers access to traffic and conversion data, lists of services/products, information about the audience and the existing content. If brand guidelines exist, they are taken into account from the start, so that the strategy is consistent with the communication. As part of these arrangements we also clarify the level of editing and the number of iterations, which directly affects how the work is organised.
The audit of existing content and decisions on its optimisation consist of reviewing and assessing what is already on the site, in order to determine the next steps for key pages. In the audit I check the content for quality, match with intent, duplication, consistency and its potential to be updated, merged or removed. An important element is the inventory of URLs and content types, i.e. compiling a list of pages and assigning them to categories (e.g. articles, guides, service pages) together with basic metrics and their role in the user journey. This stage is the basis for the subsequent work on topic and intent research.
The assessment of content quality and compliance covers, among other things, completeness, freshness, uniqueness, style, credibility and the match with queries and the goal of the given page. Based on the kick-off arrangements and the audit results, decisions are made: update / merge / remove / create. These decisions help maintain a coherent topic structure and limit problems such as keyword cannibalisation, where different pieces of content compete for similar queries. The scope of the audit may be narrowed or widened by the earlier choice of the areas of the site, markets/languages and format types to be covered by the strategy.
Topic research and keyword analysis consist of collecting topics and queries, and then organising them by intent and the stages of the user’s decision. In practice I group topics into informational, how-to, comparison and transactional, so that it is immediately clear what role they are to play on the site. In parallel, I identify topics that support the service pages, so that the content does not work in isolation from the site’s goals. The results of this stage are prepared for further mapping in the information architecture.
As part of the analysis of search results and content types, I check which formats and structures dominate for key queries. This makes it possible to determine which elements must be included in a piece for it to answer the user’s intent, rather than merely “touching on the topic”. This part of the work serves to match the planned content to searchers’ real expectations and to how Google presents the results for given queries. The conclusions of the analysis are used when choosing formats and when planning the connections between pieces of content.
Information architecture and building topic clusters consist of arranging the collected topics into a coherent structure and assigning them to sections of the site. At this stage I plan topic clusters to organise publications and limit the dispersal of keywords across the site. In parallel, I map which content plays a supporting role and how it should connect with the service pages. The outcome is a ready-to-implement logic for moving between pieces of content within the site.
As part of the internal linking plan, I set the rules and proposals for where to link from and to, and how to connect articles with the offer. In practice this also means planning how to avoid orphaned content, i.e. pages without meaningful internal connections. This stage culminates in the “Topic and connection map” document, covering the clusters, topic priorities, assignment to sections of the site and recommended connections between pieces of content. This material is the reference point for subsequent editorial and publication decisions.
The publication plan and content production guidelines cover putting together a practical topic backlog and clear standards according to which content is to be created and prepared for publication. In the “Publication plan and backlog” stage I establish the list of topics to produce and update, the order of work and the criteria for a piece being ready to publish. As a result, each topic has a defined page goal, intent and suggested format, which makes making editorial decisions easier. The result is a document that organises the work over time and reduces the risk of topics being chosen at random.
In the “Content production guidelines” stage I set the standards for creating materials, so that the content is consistent across the site and can be delivered consistently by the team. This covers structure and headings, mandatory elements, how sources are cited, style and the rules for internal linking. I also deliver a “Brief template and checklists” for the author, which sets out the goal, intent, scope and quality requirements. In parallel, I define on-page standards for the content: rules for titles, headings, descriptions, introductory passages, FAQ sections (where justified) and consistent naming across the site.
Implementing the strategy and measuring content effectiveness consist of supporting publication and establishing how results will be assessed and the plan iteratively improved. In the “Implementation and publication support” stage I provide consultations, editing for SEO and care for the consistency of the content with the adopted plan. Before publication I check the key elements of the piece, so that it complies with the arrangements and standards. The scope of this support depends on the resources and responsibilities on the client’s side, including who writes, publishes and approves the content, which affects the number of iterations and the level of editorial support.
Measurement and iterations cover establishing what to monitor and how to make decisions about updates based on a regular review of priorities. In practice this means updates to the plan, refining topics and working on content with potential, in line with the adopted method of assessment. The result is a “Content reporting model”, which organises the monitoring of, among other things, visibility, visits, on-page behaviour and how the content supports the offer. Delivery and measurement may be affected by constraints on the collaboration, such as a lack of access to data, long approval paths, a lack of expert materials, legal/industry restrictions and the need for subject-matter consultations.
Feedback from clients and industry people I have worked with on SEO projects.

I had the chance to work with Kuba at Kulturalnie o SEO, an event I organise. Kuba did a great job as a speaker and received high marks from the audience. He showed professionalism and broad knowledge. In other projects at Vestigio, Kuba shows enormous commitment, a willingness to explore and implement new ideas, and excellent organisation of his work.

You talk to me, not a salesperson
I work as a freelancer: the same person reads your message, prepares the quote and then runs the project. No sales team in between.